Govt. Hikes MSP Prices in Kharif Season, RBI Predicts Sharp Increase in Inflation
While government is busy satisfying farmers demand, this has turned to be a bad news for inflation in India, which, as per RBI, will rise if MSP prices are hiked.
NDA Government has likely sounded the poll trumpet as it has hiked the minimum support price (MSP) for paddy by a whopping Rs 200 per quintal. The move, was announced by the Union Cabinet headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and it comes less than a year ahead of general election 2019. With this, the BJP led government fulfilled its poll promise to give farmers a rate 50% higher than their cost of production. While the BJP had promised in 2014 to give farmers a price of 1.5 times of cost, an announcement to give effect to the promise was made in the government’s fifth and final annual Budget presented on February 1 this year. While government is busy satisfying farmers demand, this has turned to be a bad news for inflation in India, which, as per RBI, will rise if MSP prices are hiked.
India Rating believes the hike in minimum support price (MSP) of kharif crops for the 2018-2019 season will impact wholesale inflation by as much as 38bp yoy and retail inflation by 70bp yoy.
MSP increase announced is not uniform across the 14 kharif crops. The increase in MSP in the 2018-2019 season over 2017-2018’s varies from a low of 3.7% for Urad (65.39% return in 2017-2018) to 52.5% for Ragi (2.10% return in 2017-2018).
According to India Ratings, while the first round of impact on wholesale inflation is estimated to be 38bp, the impact on foodgrain inflation is likely to be lower at 19bp, half of the overall impact. Since the wholesale foodgrain inflation in the last 13 months has been negative, the impact of MSP increase is unlikely to translate into positive inflation. However, the impact on retail foodgrain inflation is estimated to be higher at 28bp.
Further the agency believes, while ensuring 50% return over the cost of cultivation is likely to reduce some agri distress, this would largely benefit the farmers with marketable surplus. According to agriculture census 2010-2011, 67.1% agricultural land holding belongs to small farmers (operational holding size below 1.0 hectare) and another 17.9% to small farmers (1.0-2.0 hectare). These farmers generally do not have much marketable surplus.